OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Ненецкий автономный округ

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:
  1. First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
  2. check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
  3. do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)
Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Created on: 2011-12-15, archive: 2011-11-23, 2011-11-09, 2011-10-25, 2011-10-13, 2011-09-27, 2011-09-13, 2011-09-06, 2011-08-30, 2011-08-23, 2011-08-16, 2011-08-10, 2011-07-27

Nodes
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1173 422 (60.15 %)19 (0.01 %)173 441 (60.15 %)
last edit114 877 (39.84 %)17 (0.01 %)114 894 (39.85 %)
v1 + last edit288 299 (99.99 %)36 (0.01 %)288 335 (100.00 %)
 
Ways
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v17 971 (70.21 %)1 (0.01 %)7 972 (70.22 %)
last edit3 379 (29.76 %)2 (0.02 %)3 381 (29.78 %)
v1 + last edit11 350 (99.97 %)3 (0.03 %)11 353 (100.00 %)
 
Relations
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1641 (73.76 %) (0.00 %)641 (73.76 %)
last edit227 (26.12 %)1 (0.12 %)228 (26.24 %)
v1 + last edit868 (99.88 %)1 (0.12 %)869 (100.00 %)
 
Contributors
 131 (96.32 %)5 (3.68 %)136 (100.00 %)
Legend
X  
   
Y Z

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

 

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
 
User²uidODbL³OSM merit⁴nodes⁵ways⁵relations⁵last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):96.32% 99.99%99.97%99.88% 
AMDmi3133 332171 440 (19.71 %)54 705 (18.97 %)3 183 (28.04 %)41 (4.72 %)2011-06-09
Max Vasilev18 776167 148 (18.52 %)66 383 (23.02 %)153 (1.35 %) 2011-10-14
sim35 247155 884 (15.42 %)53 829 (18.67 %)411 (3.62 %) 2009-09-15
Sergey Astakhov143 266126 377 (7.28 %)22 157 (7.68 %)708 (6.24 %)34 (3.91 %)2011-12-14
mnimt388 545122 368 (6.17 %)17 203 (5.97 %)809 (7.13 %)56 (6.44 %)2011-11-03
lenux563 357119 352 (5.34 %)12 432 (4.31 %)1 384 (12.19 %) 2011-12-13
Sever399 543117 849 (4.92 %)11 114 (3.85 %)1 335 (11.76 %)3 (0.35 %)2011-12-12
JesperFj258 878111 860 (3.27 %)9 330 (3.24 %)506 (4.46 %) 2010-06-08
mikes6 270110 826 (2.99 %)4 651 (1.61 %)1 211 (10.67 %)6 (0.69 %)2008-11-18
Dennis Apter180 46217 500 (2.07 %)  375 (43.15 %)2011-10-30
one_half_354495 11716 850 (1.89 %)3 905 (1.35 %)565 (4.98 %)6 (0.69 %)2011-12-05
Silver87310 63515 777 (1.59 %)5 372 (1.86 %)81 (0.71 %) 2011-11-04
Yarl91 05614 084 (1.13 %)3 354 (1.16 %)110 (0.97 %)9 (1.04 %)2011-06-08
Aleksandr Dezhin12 49413 589 (0.99 %)3 249 (1.13 %)44 (0.39 %)6 (0.69 %)2011-09-22
old_Bibigon71 98113 381 (0.93 %)3 376 (1.17 %)1 (0.01 %) 2010-05-18
MichaelCollinson30812 858 (0.79 %)2 858 (0.99 %)  2009-01-10
Hind79 83612 174 (0.60 %)19 (0.01 %)7 (0.06 %)106 (12.20 %)2011-08-24
Upliner67 66811 726 (0.48 %)1 726 (0.60 %)  2011-01-18
LSwan195 51011 710 (0.47 %)1 245 (0.43 %)89 (0.78 %)1 (0.12 %)2011-10-06
Enoh403 10311 582 (0.44 %)1 262 (0.44 %)64 (0.56 %) 2011-04-14
Epolyanichev207 40911 413 (0.39 %)1 368 (0.47 %)9 (0.08 %) 2010-12-27
peter_james5 40911 330 (0.37 %)1 330 (0.46 %)  2010-07-17
Zergus74 08911 231 (0.34 %)1 176 (0.41 %)11 (0.10 %) 2009-09-23
OldIvantey314 21111 180 (0.33 %) 236 (2.08 %) 2011-03-12
PA9445 0271947 (0.26 %)117 (0.04 %)62 (0.55 %)26 (2.99 %)2011-12-07
quarksteilchen45 5111788 (0.22 %)758 (0.26 %)6 (0.05 %) 2011-11-09
katpatuka17 4971782 (0.22 %)727 (0.25 %)7 (0.06 %)1 (0.12 %)2009-09-19
luch86266 0921720 (0.20 %)  36 (4.14 %)2011-05-03
evg794333 6391714 (0.20 %)694 (0.24 %)4 (0.04 %) 2010-08-25
Andre6831 2311712 (0.20 %)302 (0.10 %)78 (0.69 %)1 (0.12 %)2011-12-12
Alexandr Zeinalov161 4761680 (0.19 %)  34 (3.91 %)2011-10-28
ValentinAK313 0531597 (0.16 %)572 (0.20 %)1 (0.01 %)1 (0.12 %)2010-12-20
Noframe45 2631596 (0.16 %)596 (0.21 %)  2009-01-16
dbusse149 8761527 (0.15 %)107 (0.04 %)84 (0.74 %) 2011-11-19
bp0106204 5961480 (0.13 %)  24 (2.76 %)2011-04-02
RSergei432 5091340 (0.09 %)  17 (1.96 %)2011-10-26
lvv1960135 1381280 (0.08 %)  14 (1.61 %)2011-09-29

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.

Valid HTML 4.01 Strict CSS is valid!