OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Ненецкий автономный округ

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:

First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)

Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Created on: 2011-07-28

Nodes
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	218 448 (81.30 %)	3 310 (1.23 %)	221 758 (82.53 %)
last edit	46 928 (17.46 %)	18 (0.01 %)	46 946 (17.47 %)
v1 + last edit	265 376 (98.76 %)	3 328 (1.24 %)	268 704 (100.00 %)

Ways
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	6 121 (65.77 %)	42 (0.45 %)	6 163 (66.23 %)
last edit	3 134 (33.68 %)	9 (0.10 %)	3 143 (33.77 %)
v1 + last edit	9 255 (99.45 %)	51 (0.55 %)	9 306 (100.00 %)

Relations
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	661 (76.68 %)	(0.00 %)	661 (76.68 %)
last edit	194 (22.51 %)	7 (0.81 %)	201 (23.32 %)
v1 + last edit	855 (99.19 %)	7 (0.81 %)	862 (100.00 %)

Contributors
	107 (93.04 %)	8 (6.96 %)	115 (100.00 %)

Legend
X

Y		Z

v1 means objects created and never modified (version 1) in this region
last edit means objects last edited (version > 1) in this region
ODbL means objects which were created or modified by users who have accepted the ODbL and CT.
CC means objects which were created or modified by users who have not accepted the ODbL and CT yet, that means these objects are licenced CC.

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

Rank¹

User²	uid	ODbL³	OSM merit⁴	nodes⁵	ways⁵	relations⁵	last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):	93.04%		98.76%	99.45%	99.19%
mikes	6 270	1	80 111 (24.10 %)	73 136 (27.22 %)	1 371 (14.73 %)	6 (0.70 %)	2008-11-18
AMDmi3	133 332	1	71 769 (21.59 %)	54 889 (20.43 %)	3 204 (34.43 %)	43 (4.99 %)	2011-06-09
sim	35 247	1	56 818 (17.09 %)	54 498 (20.28 %)	464 (4.99 %)		2009-09-15
Sergey Astakhov	143 266	1	26 157 (7.87 %)	22 162 (8.25 %)	663 (7.12 %)	34 (3.94 %)	2011-04-13
mnimt	388 545	1	22 251 (6.69 %)	17 106 (6.37 %)	801 (8.61 %)	57 (6.61 %)	2011-07-01
Sever	399 543	1	16 730 (5.03 %)	10 075 (3.75 %)	1 323 (14.22 %)	2 (0.23 %)	2011-07-23
JesperFj	258 878	1	11 860 (3.57 %)	9 330 (3.47 %)	506 (5.44 %)		2010-06-08
Dennis Apter	180 462	1	7 880 (2.37 %)			394 (45.71 %)	2011-07-25
Yarl	91 056	1	4 084 (1.23 %)	3 354 (1.25 %)	110 (1.18 %)	9 (1.04 %)	2011-06-08
Aleksandr Dezhin W H S	12 494	-1	3 590 (1.08 %)	3 250 (1.21 %)	44 (0.47 %)	6 (0.70 %)	2011-01-22
old_Bibigon	71 981	1	3 381 (1.02 %)	3 376 (1.26 %)	1 (0.01 %)		2010-05-18
MichaelCollinson	308	1	3 290 (0.99 %)	3 075 (1.14 %)	43 (0.46 %)		2009-01-10
Hind	79 836	1	2 294 (0.69 %)	19 (0.01 %)	7 (0.08 %)	112 (12.99 %)	2011-06-12
Upliner	67 668	1	1 739 (0.52 %)	1 734 (0.65 %)	1 (0.01 %)		2011-01-18
LSwan	195 510	1	1 690 (0.51 %)	1 245 (0.46 %)	89 (0.96 %)		2010-12-15
Enoh	403 103	1	1 600 (0.48 %)	1 270 (0.47 %)	66 (0.71 %)		2011-04-14
Epolyanichev	207 409	1	1 413 (0.42 %)	1 368 (0.51 %)	9 (0.10 %)		2010-12-27
peter_james	5 409	1	1 330 (0.40 %)	1 330 (0.49 %)			2010-07-17
Zergus	74 089	1	1 231 (0.37 %)	1 176 (0.44 %)	11 (0.12 %)		2009-09-23
Silver87	310 635	1	1 225 (0.37 %)	1 120 (0.42 %)	21 (0.23 %)		2011-07-16
OldIvantey	314 211	1	1 220 (0.37 %)		240 (2.58 %)	1 (0.12 %)	2011-03-12
PA94	45 027	1	1 007 (0.30 %)	117 (0.04 %)	66 (0.71 %)	28 (3.25 %)	2011-04-06
katpatuka	17 497	1	811 (0.24 %)	756 (0.28 %)	7 (0.08 %)	1 (0.12 %)	2009-09-19
luch86	266 092	1	760 (0.23 %)			38 (4.41 %)	2011-05-03
evg794	333 639	1	714 (0.21 %)	694 (0.26 %)	4 (0.04 %)		2010-08-25
Noframe	45 263	1	701 (0.21 %)	596 (0.22 %)	21 (0.23 %)		2009-01-16
Alexandr Zeinalov	161 476	1	680 (0.20 %)			34 (3.94 %)	2011-07-23
ValentinAK	313 053	1	597 (0.18 %)	572 (0.21 %)	1 (0.01 %)	1 (0.12 %)	2010-12-20
bp0106	204 596	1	500 (0.15 %)			25 (2.90 %)	2011-04-02
lvv1960	135 138	1	220 (0.07 %)			11 (1.28 %)	2011-07-16

User²

uid

ODbL³

OSM merit⁴

nodes⁵

ways⁵

relations⁵

last edit

Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):

93.04%

98.76%

99.45%

99.19%

mikes

6 270

80 111 (24.10 %)

73 136 (27.22 %)

1 371 (14.73 %)

6 (0.70 %)

2008-11-18

AMDmi3

133 332

71 769 (21.59 %)

54 889 (20.43 %)

3 204 (34.43 %)

43 (4.99 %)

2011-06-09

sim

35 247

56 818 (17.09 %)

54 498 (20.28 %)

464 (4.99 %)

2009-09-15

Sergey Astakhov

143 266

26 157 (7.87 %)

22 162 (8.25 %)

663 (7.12 %)

34 (3.94 %)

2011-04-13

mnimt

388 545

22 251 (6.69 %)

17 106 (6.37 %)

801 (8.61 %)

57 (6.61 %)

2011-07-01

Sever

399 543

16 730 (5.03 %)

10 075 (3.75 %)

1 323 (14.22 %)

2 (0.23 %)

2011-07-23

JesperFj

258 878

11 860 (3.57 %)

9 330 (3.47 %)

506 (5.44 %)

2010-06-08

Dennis Apter

180 462

7 880 (2.37 %)

394 (45.71 %)

2011-07-25

Yarl

91 056

4 084 (1.23 %)

3 354 (1.25 %)

110 (1.18 %)

9 (1.04 %)

2011-06-08

Aleksandr Dezhin

W H S

12 494

-1

3 590 (1.08 %)

3 250 (1.21 %)

44 (0.47 %)

6 (0.70 %)

2011-01-22

old_Bibigon

71 981

3 381 (1.02 %)

3 376 (1.26 %)

1 (0.01 %)

2010-05-18

MichaelCollinson

308

3 290 (0.99 %)

3 075 (1.14 %)

43 (0.46 %)

2009-01-10

Hind

79 836

2 294 (0.69 %)

19 (0.01 %)

7 (0.08 %)

112 (12.99 %)

2011-06-12

Upliner

67 668

1 739 (0.52 %)

1 734 (0.65 %)

1 (0.01 %)

2011-01-18

LSwan

195 510

1 690 (0.51 %)

1 245 (0.46 %)

89 (0.96 %)

2010-12-15

Enoh

403 103

1 600 (0.48 %)

1 270 (0.47 %)

66 (0.71 %)

2011-04-14

Epolyanichev

207 409

1 413 (0.42 %)

1 368 (0.51 %)

9 (0.10 %)

2010-12-27

peter_james

5 409

1 330 (0.40 %)

1 330 (0.49 %)

2010-07-17

Zergus

74 089

1 231 (0.37 %)

1 176 (0.44 %)

11 (0.12 %)

2009-09-23

Silver87

310 635

1 225 (0.37 %)

1 120 (0.42 %)

21 (0.23 %)

2011-07-16

OldIvantey

314 211

1 220 (0.37 %)

240 (2.58 %)

1 (0.12 %)

2011-03-12

PA94

45 027

1 007 (0.30 %)

117 (0.04 %)

66 (0.71 %)

28 (3.25 %)

2011-04-06

katpatuka

17 497

811 (0.24 %)

756 (0.28 %)

7 (0.08 %)

1 (0.12 %)

2009-09-19

luch86

266 092

760 (0.23 %)

38 (4.41 %)

2011-05-03

evg794

333 639

714 (0.21 %)

694 (0.26 %)

4 (0.04 %)

2010-08-25

Noframe

45 263

701 (0.21 %)

596 (0.22 %)

21 (0.23 %)

2009-01-16

Alexandr Zeinalov

161 476

680 (0.20 %)

34 (3.94 %)

2011-07-23

ValentinAK

313 053

597 (0.18 %)

572 (0.21 %)

1 (0.01 %)

1 (0.12 %)

2010-12-20

bp0106

204 596

500 (0.15 %)

25 (2.90 %)

2011-04-02

lvv1960

135 138

220 (0.07 %)

11 (1.28 %)

2011-07-16

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.